Monthly Archives: July 2018

Book Review: My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 5/5 stars

A word of warning about “My Brilliant Friend”: This is a book best read in physical book form. The reason being there are a lot of characters and it is very difficult to keep track of who’s who and what their relationship to anyone is and Mrs. Ferrante graciously recognized this and adorned the front of the book with a cast of characters which you will likely have to consult often. It becomes unwieldy to flip back and forth when using an e-reader.

A second word of warning: This is a book that doesn’t end. I mean, there’s a last word that ends the book, but it is more of an abrupt end than an ending with any sort of closure. This is highly annoying to certain people. I think it’s worth it. So be prepared to read all four books in the series if you’re looking for actual closure. I say this not knowing how book four ends, though perhaps a hint is shown in how book one begins. I can already attest that book two opens right where book one ended so it makes sense that the others would continue and we would come full circle to the beginning of book one.

“My Brilliant Friend” is a beautiful and violent portrayal of friendship between two girls, Elena and Lila, growing up in a poor section of Naples in the 1960s. Theirs is a unique relationship formed by both differences and commonalities, by intelligence and competition, by jealousy and love. The story is told by Elena so we get to see her worries and insecurities in a very raw form and we see Lila solely through Elena’s eyes as a confident and slightly enigmatic person. It is unclear throughout whose sphere of influence is stronger, though Elena would surely say that Lila’s was and Lila would likely find it an uninteresting question. Their friendship is also tinged with deep affections and you get the feeling that, if Lila moved close and kissed Elena, a dam would break and the two would get lost in each other forever. I am certain that Lila would need to be the one to initiate it. I am less certain that Lila would feel anything if she did or if she would just do it to see what would happen. Both Elena and Lila are fascinating character studies and I found myself imagining throughout the book what the two would do in certain situations.

Many people will be shocked by the level of day to day violence portrayed in “My Brilliant Friend”. Those people likely did not grow up poor. Being poor is like Atlas carrying the crushing weight of the world on his shoulders at all times. That weight never goes away and is at times unbearable and it is in those unbearable times where the violence occurs. It is anger, yes, but it is also frustration at things beyond one’s control made manifest in the forms of kicks and punches towards those who happen to be at hand. I did not grow up in that environment, but I grew up adjacent to it and have born witness.

Ferrante is Italian and the original novel was written in Italian. Like any wonderfully written book translated from its original language to my native English, I wonder what intricacies of words, what intimacies of phrase are lost in the translation. Obviously, the translators did a brilliant job for “My Brilliant Friend”, otherwise I would not have liked it as much as I did, but I also find myself longing to read the novel in its original form so I can catch all the nuances of language that are untranslatable. If only time were infinite.

After reading “My Brilliant Friend”, I certainly know what the next three novels I am going to read are. This is just book one of a four part series called the Neapolitan Novels. Having just started book two, “The Story of a New Name”, I can already say that I am as enraptured with the second book as I was with the first. It is going to be a good couple of reading months.

Movie Review: The Equalizer 2

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 2/5 stars

Bottom Line: A poorly developed plot interspersed with a bunch of pointless vignettes. Denzel is still Denzel, though.

“The Equalizer 2” starts out pretty strong with Robert McCall (Denzel Washington) kicking ass and taking names on a train to Istanbul. We are treated to McCall’s OCD tendencies and his smooth, calm fighting style against impossible odds. At this point, I believed I was in for a treat of a movie. The opening sequence is followed by a murder half way around the world that is obviously the set up for the main plot. It then moves to a montage of McCall driving people around Boston as a Lyft driver and helping out some of them with their problems. This is genuinely touching. But then he continues to be a Lyft driver and continues to be a Lyft driver and has moments with his friend Susan Plummer (Melissa Leo who I completely didn’t recognize and love) and continues to be a Lyft driver and beats some bros up and continues to be a Lyft driver and attempts to mentor a gang banger and continues to be a Lyft driver and FINALLY we get to the main plot of the woman and dude murdered in the second scene.

The biggest flaw in this movie is that the main plot is so poorly developed. We never learn why the people who were killed in the beginning had to die. It is extremely unclear why other people had to die to cover up the first murders besides a general “they were getting too close trope”. It is also frustrating that McCall basically solves the entire thing from his armchair at home instead of dashing around the world like he does in the opening scene. The main plot also uses the aforementioned gang banger (now reformed because McCall can do anything) in a way that makes zero difference at all to the story. Why they chose to include him in the main plot is beyond me. Oh, and there’s also a hurricane because why not? And the movie is two hours!

Denzel Washington is still fun to watch act and his “beat up the bad guys” scenes are fun to watch and well choreographed, but Denzel Washington and violence do not a good movie make. It is too bad this movie is so poor because the whole idea of an Equalizer is pretty good and you’d think there’s a lot of material to work with. Really, I think the movie would have been better off if McCall just had just driven around Boston and helped his fares for two hours.

Movie Review: Ant-Man And The Wasp

Jean-Paul’s rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Fun and funny. Creatively choreographed growing/shrinking sequences. Yay, a female superhero who gets title billing! And another good and believable villain!

Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) is back and once again he is a delightful comedic escape from the more serious Marvel universe. This time he’s paired with the Wasp (Evangeline Lilly (I love that first name)), Hank Pym’s (Michael Douglas) daughter. After a brief interlude in which it is explained how Wasp/Hope van Dyne became the Wasp, since it was not alluded to at all in the first movie and basically is “your mother is lost in the quantum realm and we can save her and oh, here’s her suit”, we see Scott Lang/Ant-Man under house arrest after his antics in “Avengers: Civil War”. Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this time establishment scene and the mid-credit teaser are all that we really see into the larger Marvel universe. This is a good thing. It lets Ant-Man be Ant-Man.

Once again, we are treated to a compelling villain! If Marvel keeps this up, I may start believing they’re getting good at it. This time it’s Ghost/Ava (Hannah John-Kamen) who is trying to create the quantum tunnel that Hope and Hank are also trying to accomplish, but by more villainous means. Everything she does makes sense. It’s refreshing. Not only that, but this movie is, I believe only the second film where a female superhero gets movie title billing. Only other one being “Electra”. Given, it’s shared title billing, but the dam is starting to break. Next up is “Captain Marvel” which is also about a female superhero! Yay!

Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this one also features some wonderfully choreographed action sequences. The use of both Wasp’s and Ant-Man’s shrinking abilities is used to great effect and we are treated to Wasp running down the blade of a knife that is thrown at her and using a quickly enlarged salt shaker to prevent a bad guy’s escape. I guess most of it was actually Wasp. Ant-Man was in this movie too, I swear. More for comedy relief, I guess.

Hey, I just realized that I liked the sequel better than the original. That doesn’t happen very often. “Ant-Man and the Wasp” is definitely a worth watching movie and its comedy give it great replay value too. It’s not necessarily a need to see it in the movie theater type of movie, but you’ll be happy if you watch it now instead of waiting for, what is it these days, three months?

Movie Review: Ocean’s Eight

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Exudes sexy-cool from every pore. A classic crime caper complete with a capable coterie of criminal con artists.

“Ocean’s Eight” has a lot going for it. Nowhere can this be seen more so than in the relationship between Debbie Ocean (Sandra Bullock) and Lou (Cate Blanchett). If con artists are capable of having best friends, Debbie and Lou are best friends. Their interactions are just so casual and organic. You just want to BE there with them. Soak them in. Revel in their interactions and their banter. You won’t have your watch, your wallet, your bank account, and quite possibly your house if you do so, but it would be worth it just to experience them. Cate Blanchett is just wonderful as Lou. She has this casual-cool to her with a sexy I-don’t-give-a-whit strut and a slightly stoned seen-everything-know-everything look. Even the way she chews her gum just exudes confidence.

The story is pretty standard heist film fare. In this case, an overly complicated plot to steal a ridiculously expensive necklace with a hidden other plot of revenge and a few bonus thefts thrown in. It’s fun watching them put it together and it’s fun watching them execute it. It helps that it’s all done under the grandiose backdrop of the Met Gala so it also features wonderful works of art both in the traditional sense and in the fashion sense. The only thing that didn’t quite work for me was the “catch”, that part where a wrench is thrown into the precisely planned caper. In this case, “catch” is both literal and figurative so maybe they did it just for that wink-nod, but it didn’t really add much to the overall enjoyment of the film and it was introduced and cleaned up without much fanfare.

What we have here is a pretty decent heist film and if you like heist films, you will enjoy “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like fashion, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like an assembly of strong, confident women, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. In summary, you’ll probably like “Ocean’s Eight” and it is a worthy addition to the franchise. It has also done pretty good at the box office so I have my fingers crossed for more Debbie and Lou antics in the near future.